The MacBook Neo: A Wuling Air EV in a World of R34 Delusions

The “spec goblins” are at it again. You can hear them now, huddled in their dark corners of Reddit, screeching about the “indignity” of a USB 2.0 port and the lack of MagSafe. They’re busy counting cores and measuring nits while completely missing the point. Apple hasn’t released a “bad” laptop; they’ve finally figured out how to sell us their leftovers—and make us love them for it.

At $599, the MacBook Neo is the “Fisher-Price Macintosh.” It’s a heat-seeking missile aimed directly at the bloated, plastic-laden mid-range Windows market. And the secret sauce? It’s powered by the A18 Pro—or more accurately, the A18 Pro chips that weren’t “Pro” enough for the iPhone. Apple has taken the “binned” silicon and given it a second life in an aluminum shell. It’s genius logistics disguised as a “breakthrough” price.

But let’s talk about the automotive delusion. The spec bros are trashing the Neo because it isn’t an over-spec’d BMW M3 or some twin-turbo Nissan Skyline GT-R R34. They want a machine that can handle 150 mph on a track they’ll never visit. People buying the MacBook Neo won’t be doing 4K video productions (though they probably can) or heavy workloads that need the latest and greatest. They’ll be using apps like Google Docs, Canva, Notion, or Office, maybe a little Claude Code, not multitrack FCP or sophisticated Photoshop and motion graphics work

Then there’s the other side: the “Appliance” crowd. They love the Wuling Air EV or the BYD Atto 1. These cars are the darlings of the streets right now because they’re compact, affordable, and honest. They don’t pretend to be racers; they’re just stylish city-slicers.

Now, full disclosure: I wouldn’t buy a Neo for myself. And I certainly wouldn’t trade my 1997 BMW 323i for a BYD Atto 1. I’ll take an aging inline-six with actual road feel over a silent electric pod any day (though I wouldn’t say no to a more proper EV like the Hyundai Ioniq or a BYD Seal).

But we have to stop projecting our “enthusiast” needs onto the general public. Most people don’t need 0-60 in three seconds or a liquid-cooled GPU. They need to get to the grocery store or finish a term paper without the “transmission” falling out.

The Neo is the Air EV of computing. The benchmarks don’t lie: even a “binned” A18 Pro wipes the floor with the legendary M1 in single-core tasks. It’s 50% faster than Window PCs where it actually matters for daily use. It’s a 3nm monster in a toy’s clothing.

Yes, the speakers sound like tin cans, there’s no Thunderbolt and only one of the two USB ports is high speed but you don’t buy a budget EV and then complain that it lacks Italian leather. You buy it because it’s $599, it looks great in different colors, and it’s a portal into an ecosystem that actually works. Right now you can budget $2000 and get an Apple MacBook Neo, an Apple Watch SE, an iPhone 17e, a pair of AirPods 4, a year of Apple One subscription and still have some change. Before this month it wasn’t possible!

The MacBook Neo is the spiritual successor to the base-model iPad. It’s for the switcher who is tired of Windows breaking their life, and the parent who isn’t buying a $1,200 Facebook machine. I’ll keep my “classic” power-user gear, and you probably will too. But while the spec-heads are busy complaining about port speeds, these low end MacBooks will fly off the shelves and into the hands of people who need them.

Comparing your Mac’s raw performance with other Macs

The benchmark is a PowerMac G5 1.6GHz at 1000 points, measured using GeekBench. You can switch between 32-bit and 64-bit performances.

My late 2007 2.2GHz MacBook scored 3281 for 64bit performance, just 50 points ahead of the same speed MacBook Pro released earlier in the same year, which means it’s just over three times more powerful than the baseline PowerMac G5. The base model 2011 MacBook Air with Core i5 though, scored 4988, nearly five times more powerful.

Comparing your Mac’s raw performance with other Macs

iPad habit creeping in to MacBook

Apple's mobile devices

No matter how hard you expect it to happen, those keys on that MacBook’s keyboard won’t ever flip and reveal additional characters. Oh, and there’s no .?123 key on the MacBook to tap and flip the keyboard. Maybe in the future when Apple introduces context aware touch-enabled keyboard for its Macs as per their patent, but not now, not yet, and definitely not on this MacBook you’re typing on.

This is something I have to remind myself almost daily since May. The time spent typing on the iPad has definitely taken over my muscle memory on using the MacBook and its traditional (I’m trying to avoid describing it as quaint) keyboard.

Speaking of additional characters, I wish Apple would incorporate special characters and symbols into the iOS keyboards. All they have to do is make it an additional keyboard option that can be activated by tapping the globe icon.

More than a year ago I got so used to double tapping the space bar to end a sentence when typing on the iPhone, I started doing it on the MacBook.

Replacing the Mac with the iPad

I’ve pretty much offloaded most of the things I used to do on my Mac to the iPhone and the iPad for a much lighter traveling set.

Last week I spent four days out of town and left the MacBook at home. It was a test to see if it might be time to return to the desktop should I decide to replace my notebook. For the most part, it worked especially when time came to look for a power outlet. There was much less need for this ridiculous exercise.

Aside from browsing and email, Notes and Pastebot took care of my writing needs, I’ve got plenty of games in both devices to keep me entertained, iBooks works great as a portable library, and I’ve got almost a full folder of apps to play around with my photos.

What I haven’t found is an app that can fully replace Pixelmator on either the iPhone or the iPad. There are apps like PhotoForge and Photogene but they cover strictly photo manipulation processes. iDraw is an interesting proposition but will need to see convincing reviews for it.

Sometimes I need to come up with a quick image that’s not necessarily based on a photograph and I haven’t found the right app for it. Wanted to check out iDraw on the iPad but I need to know if it’s worth buying or if it’s overkill.

One last hurdle for replacing the Mac as my primary workstation is the fact that there’s no way you can embed a URL inside text. I consider that a deal breaker.

Aside from that and being the hub for the iPad and iPhone, there’s not a lot that I use the Mac for anymore.