havearide:

9GAG – The truth behind the Angry Birds

iPad 2 roll out on March 25 (Taken with instagram)

lharboe:

Lion’s All My Files icon. Read the quotes.

How far away is the moon? It’s further than most people think : science

nickdouglas:

A thread full of graphics and descriptions of how insanely far away all the objects in space are from each other.

How far away is the moon? It’s further than most people think : science

laughingsquid:

The Noob’s Guide to Tumblr – Urlesque

This is me. On Foursquare. Apparently I’m a Foursquare early adopter. This makes me curious of my entry for Koprol, too bad they haven’t released their API. I’m not sure what Friends and Following there means. I follow 296 accounts which apparently counts as friends but not following. Difference? Anyone?

You can get your own Foursquare infographic here at Stormpixel

Alleyway. Lung cancer edition.

Long-time Engadget editor Paul Miller departs as AOL becomes the Dell of online journalism

bytethis:

On Friday Paul Miller resigned from engadget after more than five years at the high flying gadget blog. He was the first casualty of AOL’s insistence on pushing the “AOL Way” of doing business as it thrives to be an online media powerhouse. His reason? 

As detailed in the “AOL Way,” and borne out in personal experience, AOL sees content as a commodity it can sell ads against. That might make good business sense (though I doubt it), but it doesn’t promote good journalism or even good entertainment, and it doesn’t allow an ambitious team like the one I know and love at Engadget to thrive

The always brilliant Paul Carr over at AOL-owned TechCrunch puts Miller’s resignation in a satirical light and it is a must read. 

The AOL Way is a deck of presentation slides detailing the new policy and direction that AOL had recently introduced following its acquisition of The Huffington Post. The reason for this document is to dramatically increase page views by raising the number of published articles. This description, however, is putting things in an extremely simplified way.

What AOL wants to do is pretty close to what Demand Media is doing. It wants each story to reflect, or become, the kind of story that people look for. AOL wants to increase discovery through search by ensuring each piece fully conforms to SEO keywords and take advantage of the hot issue at any particular point in time to ensure the story gets as many hits as possible.

In other words, instead of promoting and enhancing journalism, AOL’s guidance is for its properties to become content factories, churning out stories and articles that maximizes profit ahead of quality. In other words, instead of becoming something like Apple, a design driven consumer electronics powerhouse that churns out highly desirable industry inspiring products, AOL wants to be the Dell of journalism. One that cranks out unimaginative products based according to what’s popular at that time. AOL is taking its properties, each one a leader in its respective areas, and turning them into followers.

Is giving people what they want a bad thing? Not necessarily but as Apple CEO Steve Jobs puts it, people don’t always know what they want. Two centuries ago people wanted faster and stronger horses, but Henry Ford thought differently, so he built automobiles instead.

Long-time Engadget editor Paul Miller departs as AOL becomes the Dell of online journalism

Separated at birth? That’s Burt Reynolds, actor, and Leo Apotheker, CEO of Hewlett-Packard

Should we blame Top Gun for the current state of the film industry?

That generation of 16-to-24-year-olds—the guys who felt the rush of Top Gun because it was custom-built to excite them—is now in its forties, exactly the age of many mid- and upper-midrange studio executives. And increasingly, it is their taste, their appetite, and the aesthetic of their late-‘80s postadolescence that is shaping moviemaking. Which may be a brutally unfair generalization, but also leads to a legitimate question: Who would you rather have in charge—someone whose definition of a classic is Jaws or someone whose definition of a classic is Top Gun?

Should we blame Top Gun for the current state of the film industry?