$190 USB cable from Vertu

Some gems in the post from Rob Beschizza at BoingBoing:

Vertu has long specialized in calculator-display brickphones that look like dragon poo rolled in gemstones

Though the company’s future is uncertain–Nokia is reportedly trying to offload it–Vertu still understands the communication needs of oil wives and drug dealers better than anyone

Here’s the cable. It’s standard issue USB, not even gold plated or adorned with crystal.

$190 USB cable from Vertu

Clopen

Danny Sullivan’s piece on how Android isn’t really open as far as consumers are concerned.

Damning paragraph:

A big reason behind this mess is that Google doesn’t actually sell the Android operating system to consumers. If it did, it would probably care more about ensuring customers (because that’s what they would be) were covered from start to finish.

My expanded thoughts on this on DailySocial.

Clopen

About Nokia N9’s Photo Sharing

The N9 has the ability to take excellent photos of various sizes and resolutions up to 8 megapixels. It even has built-in white balance adjustments, filter options, as well as exposure and ISO settings which is more than can be said about built-in camera applications on other mobile platforms. There is little to complain about the N9’s photographic credentials. Except when it comes to sharing the photos to the Internet.

The N9 actually has a decent selection of sharing options. Upon opening the menu to share items within the Gallery app, your next step would be to select the photos you wish to share and then tap the Share button at the bottom of the screen. You are then presented with a list of sharing options which include Facebook, Flickr, MMS, email, bluetooth, and NFC. But there’s a couple of things overlooked.

No sharing to Twitter

This is where the first problem appears. Twitter is among the most popular places to share photos yet it’s not available as an option. Sure, Facebook and Flickr are two of the most popular places for photo sharing but Twitter is a widely popular place as well, so why is the option missing?

I’m willing to give the benefit of the doubt and accept that it may have been overlooked or set aside in the need to ship public release versions 1.0 and 1.1 of the N9’s software so I would very much like to see this remedied in the next major release.

The workaround, which is selecting the photo from within the built in Twitter app, while acceptable, does not work very well. There is also no other Twitter app available for the N9 unless you consider the poorly made Twimgo as an option, but I digress.

When selecting the photo attachment option in the tweet composition screen, the photo library that appears takes you to the oldest photos, located on top of the list, which is the reverse of what the actual Gallery app displays. Did somebody at Nokia miss a memo?

This means if you have hundreds of photos in the gallery, you’ll have to scroll, and scroll, and scroll, and scroll, all the way to the bottom to get to your most recent photo before you can share it on Twitter. This is ridiculous.

You are more likely to share on Twitter the most recent photo you took, instead of the oldest, so the image gallery within the Twitter app should immediately show you the latest photos instead.

No image compression options

Bandwidth is a limited resource on mobile connection and sharing images to the internet can be quote a taxing activity depending on the quality of the connection. Given that a large part of the planet doesn’t have stable and unlimited mobile data access, it’s a surprise that the N9 does not offer image compression options.

As it stands, full resolution photos taken by the N9’s camera can yield photos with the size of up to 3 megabytes each. Without web optimized image compression, one photo will take a very long time to upload, not to mention when there are several photos being uploaded.

It is truly a surprise that the N9 was allowed to ship without being able to alter the compression rate of the photos it takes when sharing them online.

When Nokia Music makes sure that the songs it makes available for download to each mobile device is delivered with a bitrate of less than 96kbps, far less than the expected standard of 128kbps quality, simply to speed up the download, it’s a wonder that the company neglected to make the necessary file size adjustment to allow for faster photo uploading. After all, mobile data upload speeds are generally set much slower than download speeds.

Why not take photos at a lower resolution, say 3 megapixels? That would waste the capability of the camera to take better looking photos now wouldn’t it?

It’s entirely possible to take a photo at high resolution, then downsample that to a much lower file size but still maintain much of the depth, sharpness, and quality of the image. Look at sports photos for example, or stock photos online.

Minor but Irritating

Having said that, these are relatively minor issues that probably should have been addressed before the device shipped but since they’re software related, they can be fixed with an upcoming update.

Of course, this would bring up the debate of what features could you ship it without? Since Nokia chose to ship it with Twitter and photo sharing, it really ought to have implemented these options. At least have the image gallery in the Twitter app reflect the actual Gallery app, instead of presenting the reverse.

As for the lack of direct sharing to Twitter, perhaps it’s not as egregious as not having copy/paste function built-in.

One wonders though if Nokia will address these at all, given that it has moved on to Windows Phone. Since the N9 is still a current product and Nokia has a history of strong product support however, it’s probably not too far fetched to expect these changes being brought in.

pinotski:

The digital assistant, from early 90s till now. #retrotech (Taken with instagram)

With “Open” Arms

parislemon:

Chris Ziegler of The Verge was finally able to clarify (via a source, presumably within Google) what Google means exactly when they give Android activation numbers. Essentially, it’s when you activate Google services on the device.

In other words, Kindle Fire, Nook, etc, don’t count as Android devices by this metric. Seems a bit odd, no? Android is an open ecosystem, but Google only counts you if use their services. 

Sure, you can argue that Google has no way of knowing the numbers for those other Android devices, but they could at least acknowledge them. It’s weird that they don’t given the millions of units this would add overall ecosystem bottom line. 

On the other hand, Google probably doesn’t like what players like Amazon are doing by forking Android. You usually don’t give your enemy a pat on the back. 

With “Open” Arms

There’s a detailed breakdown of the interview on the video’s YouTube page in case you’d rather watch the video based on the questions rather than sit through the entire hour and an quarter of the video. A must see.

dailylicious2:

Dave Morin from Path interviewed by Jason Calacanis for This Week in Startups

If Twitter is the backchannel of life, Path is the backchannel of Twitter

I’ve been so hooked on Path, it has managed to replace Twitter as my go to app every morning.

I love the private sharing feature it imposes on its members and I have no qualms rejecting sharing requests from people I know simply to limit my spread of updates. It’s not like I’ve left Twitter. My primary presence is still on Twitter but for a lot of personal updates, Path really is the place. Twitter is the public plaza where you seek out general news and other info.

Google+ would have been it though if the mobile app wasn’t so shit in the first place. Despite the focus on design Google has taken in recent months, its mobile app developers haven’t seem to be able to grasp how important a well-designed interface is when it comes to applications. The team has some serious issues to address.

Perhaps I’m part of an elite snob whose view on mobile apps have been so skewed by Apple’s near-meticulous designs, that I place a stronger emphasis on interface design in delivering functions, although Apple’s own apps are beginning to look ridiculous themselves lately.

Honestly there’s little to differentiate between Path and Facebook on mobile but Path isn’t full of people whose updates I don’t give a shit about. I mean yeah, I added those people on Facebook because I used to know them or I just met them but the kinds of things they share on Facebook are either duplicates of what they said on Twitter or that I’m so far removed from them these days that whatever they posted just fails to catch my interest anymore.

I set up this blog for Jakarta’s early Twitter adopters and as it turns out, Path is taking over the role what Twitter used to be back in the days of 2007-2008. 

Twitter is now like the mall and Path is that street corner cafe where you and your closest friends hang out. This is a funny analogy because back in 2008, Facebook was the mall and Twitter was the corner cafe. So what is Facebook now? I have no idea, I couldn’t care less and I only use it for messaging.

The other day I said that if Twitter is the backchannel of life, Path is the backchannel of Twitter.

I can’t believe this exists.

siliconvalleyryangosling:

Hey girl.  I know how much you hate vaporware so I’m not going to bother you until I have a functioning demo.  

gueamu:

Evian Star Wars Edition

This was Vodafone India’s attempt at getting non-corporate people to use BlackBerrys last year. No kidding. The guy in the middle reminds me of Balsillie